As the headline says recent floods in Pakistan have proved that whole world is sick of them and want Pakistan to suffer then helping the poor and destroyed by flood people in Pakistan.
With money hungry leaders, government, army and other Muslim countries keeping quiet when it comes to donation and helping their own brothers and sisters.
It seems like every one now know that what the Pakistan government is going to do with all the aid money and funds…….Build more bombs and breed more terrorists and terror around the world and against India.
Below are the comments from the people around the globe about the situation:
No wonder no-one wants to know when Pakistan turns a blind eye to the terrorism emanating from the country
- Mullarkian, York, 17/8/2010 14:37
Very sad. But 1/ this country’s leaders are some of the most corrupt around and they have squandered millions instead of helping their own people. 2/ Where are the Muslim countries when their own need help. Hmm very quiet. But why has this government never learnt from the past? Sorry but I have limited sympathy for Pakistan, they fate is in their own hands. Rains are nothing new. Maybe their government should be focussing on the important things in their country and forget the Bomb!!
- George, Shanghai, 17/8/2010 14:21
perhaps the international population are reluctant to donate money to a country that breeds and harbours terrorists. it is about time that Politicians in the west stop financing and appeasing countries who do not give a care about non-muslims. Tell them to stop financing nuclear bombs and use the money instead to build a better environment for themselves without the help of suckers in the UK and US
- not a racist, stirlingshire, 17/8/2010 14:19
Oh dear. Use some of the money being used for the phoney war in Afghanistan and bring all our soldiers home. Red arrows folks!
- Union Jack, Staffs, 17/8/2010 14:17
It is a calamity. But the problem is that Pakistani leadership always seem not to be able to talk without the begging bowl out. This happened during the Musharaf years, as well as with the current government.
As other viewers have asked – where is the BILLIONS in aid being given going? They seem to have enough money to build and upgrade their nukes, how come they do not have the resources to provide aid and shelter to heir own kith and kin?
- sapper, Ridgefield, CT, USA, 17/8/2010 14:07
I wonder to what extent overseas generosity is affected by the uncertainty whether money, or in kind aid, will end up in the pockets of corrupt politicians and powerful land owners. Transparency International does, after all rate Pakistan as one of the most corrupt countries on the planet
- mel, Not in the UK, 17/8/2010 14:04
| Annie Kate | August 2nd, 2010 3:53 pm ET The pictures of the Pakistan flood are a tremendous witness to the suffering resulting from this act of nature. Another country that is also suffering but from record heat and the fires it has created in the forests and the peat bogs as well as killing a substantial portion of their wheat crop is Russia. It seems that this year nature has been particularly hard on the residents of its planet from earthquakes to wildfires to flooding to hurricanes, etc. Thank you for showing the pictures from Pakistan. |
|
| me | August 2nd, 2010 4:12 pm ET Speechless,smthing really has to give with the climatic changes affecting the earth as a result of our destructive;all consumin nature.We mustn’t b cavaliar bout the butterfly.I feel 4 the families out in z cold. |
|
| Soni | August 2nd, 2010 4:34 pm ET Such a sad news. Hope relief agencies reach their on time. |
|
| Yasir Imran | August 2nd, 2010 4:56 pm ET It was very sad, International community should donate funds to help the victims. |
|
| Muriel | August 2nd, 2010 7:13 pm ET This is happing all over the world now. We had it in the United States 6 years ago, now the other portion of the world is getting it. Good report Anderson as always. |
|
| rachel berndt | August 5th, 2010 12:01 am ET I am seriously praying for Pakistan. Pakistan: the only Holy God of Israel LOVES you. We are praying for you in God’s Holy Power and Love. http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2010/08/02/gallery-pakistan-floods-kill-over-1000/Jason Thomas: Sorry but didnt the US just authorise USD7.5b to Pakistan over the next five years? This is on top of the USD10b that was given to Pakistan during the Bush Administration. Posted by Jason Thomas | August 12, 2010 6:30 AM Anon part 2: nice comments guys.. really… lets stop to think for a second that it was the U.S that forced pakistan to help them with this b.s “war on terror” aka as war supported by the brain washed people who do not know what their country is really fighting for. since pakistan is helping the u.s by assigning troops to the norther part of pakistan to fight the taliban, the people of pakistan do no trust their government and now pakistan has more than 30 terrorist groups. So it is definetely up to you the u.s to help out pakistan because they need pakistan to be one of their many puppet countries. How about we all blame our problems on “terrorist and taliban” Posted by Anon part 2 | August 13, 2010 4:09 PM anon part 4: money does not seem to work to make pakistan to be a puppet. money cannot even make pakistan stop supporting jihadi group that are attacking us. so go figure Posted by anon part 4 | August 16, 2010 6:34 PM http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/2010/08/pakistan-floods-how-to-help/This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
–>
|
|
Megacities of Future

Over the next two decades, the world will see a burst of urban expansion at a speed and on a scale never before witnessed in human history. But not all the world will take part. When you hear about the coming urban age, it’s really a story about rising Asia and the two countries that will define this new era of the megacity: China and India. Half of Asia will become urbanized, and nearly a billion people will shift from countryside to cityscape. Trillions of dollars will need to be spent on roads, trains, power plants, water systems, and social services. And it’s going to happen in less than half the time that it took the West. China and India will account for two-fifths of the world’s urban growth, but they are pursuing wildly different strategies for managing this shift. Beijing’s approach is systematic: The government has invested ahead, allocated land, plotted out transportation networks, and given its cities the freedom to raise capital. New Delhi, meanwhile, hasn’t done enough to prepare. So while China has embraced a future of office parks and high-speed rail, India is just waking up to its new urban reality.
Who Goes Where
In just two decades, China will have a whopping 44 urban areas boasting populations larger than 4 million. India will have 11 such cities. Who will live there? In China, the answer is simple: migrants from rural areas. Growth in India’s cities, by contrast, will mainly be organic. The country’s population is also much younger than China’s. A mere 16 percent of India’s population will be over 55 in 20 years, while 28 percent of China’s will be.
What Needs Building?
It’s the stuff of dreams for developers and construction companies. If current trends hold, China will need 40 billion square meters of combined residential and commercial floor space over the next 20 years — equivalent to adding one New York every two years. India, on the other hand, needs to start building between 700 million and 900 million square meters of combined residential and commercial space each year — equivalent to adding more than two Mumbais or one Chicago each year.
Transportation
China has the potential to revolutionize mass transit — it already has plans for building new metros, highways, and high-speed trains in its top 170 cities. In fact, Beijing has already begun investing heavily in this sector; between 2004 and 2006 alone, spending on urban transportation increased almost 50 percent. New Delhi’s spending on transportation infrastructure, however, needs to pick up urgently. At its current rate of metro and road construction, India is headed for gridlock on a massive scale. The country needs to build 350 to 400 kilometers of metro rail every year to keep up with its current standards — but that’s more than 20 times the capacity that has been built in the past decade.
Energy
It’s hard to understate what a massive impact the coming urbanization in China and India will have on energy markets. Demand for power in China’s cities will more than double from today’s level, accounting for roughly 20 percent of global energy consumption. Meeting that need will call for huge investments in coal, of which China is already the largest international buyer. India’s power targets are also ambitious; the country hopes to add 62,000 megawatts to its grid by 2012. If trends continue, India’s carbon dioxide emissions will grow nearly sevenfold by 2030, while China’s will nearly double.
The Price Tag
Urban growth will come with a high price tag — a whopping $35-$40 trillion in China and $2.2 trillion in India over the coming two decades. In addition to all the building and public infrastructure, China and India will need to invest heavily in delivering services — everything from education to health care to social security. As China’s over-65 population more than doubles and migrants flood its cities, government spending on health care will struggle to keep up, rising from 19 percent to 21 percent of GDP. Even with China’s massive economic growth, paying the bill won’t be easy. Many of Chi-na’s largest cities are self-sufficient, but other smaller and newer areas are already running deficits. India’s urban spending, meanwhile, is already very low by international standards.
What Will It Be Like to Live There?
The megacity will be home to China’s and India’s growing middle classes — creating consumer markets larger than to-day’s Japan and Spain, respectively. In China, the number of urban middle-class households will quintuple; in India it will grow nearly fourfold. India’s wealthiest urban households — those earning more than 1 million rupees a year (about $22,000) — could number 11 million, more than the total number of households in Australia today. In both countries, the wealth gap between rural and urban areas will grow with urbanization. Urban GDP per capita will exceed rural GDP by 3.5 times in China and more than five times in India.
Jobs
Jobs in the cities will be more prevalent, productive, and lucrative in urban China and India than in rural areas. China’s ranks of university graduates — growing by 26 percent annually — will mostly work in cities, which will compete to recruit their skills. In India, three-quarters of new urban jobs will be in the service sector.
Traffic Nightmare
Even if China and India build roads and metro rail as fast as practically possible, they still won’t be able to match the soaring rates of car ownership and urban growth. The number of vehicles in China, for example, has grown three times faster than the capacity of roads over the last 20 years. In Beijing, traffic speed has already dropped to less than half of London’s. India’s predicament is even worse; if the country invests in its urban infrastructure at the predicted rate — an estimated $300 billion over 20 years — traffic across the country could literally come to a standstill.
Service Gap
China’s biggest urban challenge may be water; already, it has little to spare. Some 70 percent of water use today traces back to agriculture, but demand from urban consumers and commercial enterprise is on the rise. Even if the sheer amount of water isn’t the problem, location will be; the country will need to spend more than $120 billion on water systems in the coming years to transport, store, and manage supplies. In India, service delivery will fall woefully short of demand in coming years across most urban infrastructure sectors. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/08/16/prime_numbers_megacities?page=0,0
Eagleburger: World’s Going to War Over Iranian Nukes
Former U.S. Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger says that, unless civilized nations act soon to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions, “the world’s going to go to war over this.”
His remark came in reaction to the news that Russia has announced it will begin loading nuclear-fuel rods into an Iranian nuclear reactor on Aug. 21.
International nuclear watchdogs will monitor the fueling process, Russia contends. Iran also has guaranteed in writing that it will send all its spent fuel rods to Russia for processing, to prevent enriched material from being used in nuclear weapons, Russia says.
But former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton said Friday that Iran soon could use fuel rods at its Bushehr reactor to produce weapons-grade material.
Bolton also ruled out any attack on the reactor once it is loaded with uranium fuel due to the risk of radioactive contamination of the Persian Gulf region.
Eagleburger clearly shared Bolton’s alarm at Friday’s developments.
“There will be a real blow up,” Eagleburger told Fox News host Neil Cavuto. “Somebody will end up using one of these things.
“If Iran gets the weapon it’s going to use it,” added Eagleburger, who served in four presidential administrations, including a brief stint as secretary of State under former President George H.W. Bush. “I think they’re on the way to getting it, and we’re going to let it happen.
“And when I say ‘we,’” he continued, “I don’t just mean the U.S. I mean the civilized world, the Russians.
“They are going to regret someday what they have done because their neighbor, Iran, is going to have a nuclear weapon and it’s going to throw it around like mad. And Israel will certainly be the first target. And the world’s going to go to war over this. It very much has a potential of happening . . . As sure as I’m sitting here, I know it’s coming.”
Eagleburger said international nonproliferation went awry “when we let the North Koreans get the weapon.”
That event, he said, started the world “down the wrong track and we’ve been on it ever since.
Eagleburger said the ongoing game of nuclear chicken that Iran appears to be playing reminds him of events leading up to the Second World War.
“When you’re as old as I am,” he told Cavuto, “if you remember how much this sounds like the workup to WWII, when everybody was letting things go by, letting things happen, and nobody was doing anything to stop what was clearly a track toward war. And we’re doing it again, we’re doing it again.
“We know enough about nuclear weapons that we know this thing is going to happen. It may well be a historic time. The issue is going to be whether the Israelis decide at some point they have to act.
“If they do, it will be for reasons that I at least understand, but the world will not understand them. And the Israelis will be attacked for doing what they have to do to protect themselves, but it probably won’t be enough,” he said.
Eagleburger predicted that Israel would unfairly suffer international condemnation if it attacks Iran’s nuclear facilities.
“What would you do if you were an Israeli and somebody said he was going to build a nuclear weapon and it was going to be used against Israel?” he said.
Eagleburger said the entire international community would bear responsibility for not stopping Iran.
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/eagleburger-iran-russia-nuclear-war-fox-cavuto/2010/08/15/id/367517
Chinese dam projects raise alarm in Asia
Rivers in Asia that cross national borders are becoming a new source of confrontation among nations.
Water shortages will likely become even more severe due to economic development and global warming. That would make the water issue a major factor for Asia’s national security.
While 60 percent of the world’s population lives in Asia, it only has 36 percent of the available water resources on Earth.
One such river is the Brahmaputra, which flows from Tibet through India to Bangladesh.
Last October, an Indian newspaper carried a front page story that said China was constructing a dam upriver.
China has admitted to a plan to construct five dams, but officials insist there would be no effect on people living downriver because the dams would be for hydropower generation and water would be released on a regular basis.
However, Indian officials remain worried, fearing China could control the water flow depending on their own motives.
“China may be trying to divert the flow of the Brahmaputra to their own side,” said Ashok Jaitly, director of the Water Resources Division at the Energy and Resources Institute in India.
What he likely had in mind was China’s project to transport water from the south of the nation to northern regions that often face drought conditions.
While Beijing’s plan currently calls for diverting water from domestic rivers, there are hints of proposals that would take water from transnational rivers.
In a 2007 report, Britain’s Defense Ministry said conflicts over water resources could heighten the possibility of triggering military action or population migration, citing China’s possible move to change the course of the Brahmaputra River.
An official with China’s Foreign Ministry brushed off India’s concerns and said, “China is a responsible nation. It will not damage the interests of other nations.”
China and India have approved a memorandum to exchange water usage information during the rainy season.
However, Gautam Bambawale, who heads the East Asia Division at India’s Ministry of External Affairs, said there will be a need for a rivers agreement to discuss development issues with China in the future.
Difficulties similar to those that concern China and India can also be found in Indochina.
This spring, the region was hit by a major drought, and the Mekong River had the lowest water levels ever observed over the past 50 years.
Nations along the banks of the Mekong suffered damage to their agricultural and fishing industries.
In Thailand and Vietnam, criticism was directed at the construction of dams upriver by China.
Jirasak Intayot, a member of an environmental nongovernmental organization, said, “This is not only due to low rainfall, but it is also because China’s dams have accumulated the water. The Thanlwin River, which also flows from Tibet, has a high water level because there are few dams along it.”
The Thanlwin is also known as the Salween River.
China plans to build 15 gigantic dams in Yunnan province upriver along the Mekong River.
The dams will have a total electric power generation capacity of 25 million kilowatts in 10 years time. That would exceed the capacity of the Three Gorges Dam, which is currently the world’s largest.
The Nuozhadu Dam, under construction in the city of Puer, will have a water storage capacity that is more than 30-fold that of Japan’s largest dam, the Tokuyama Dam in Gifu Prefecture.
It will have an electric power generation capacity of 5.5 million kilowatts, or the equivalent of five large nuclear power reactors.
http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201008150109.html
Study: Prayer Actually Heals
Prayer heals when it’s close-up and personal, and there’s a study to prove it.
It’s not just any kind of prayer, but “proximal intercessory prayer,” or PIP — when one or more people pray for someone in that person’s presence and often with physical contact — that was found by a team of doctors, scientists, and religious experts to have remarkable results in healing some patients.
A team of medical doctors and scientists led by Indiana University professor of religion Candy Gunther Brown found in the study, conducted in rural Mozambique, that prayer brought “highly significant” improvements to hearing-impaired participants and significant changes to the visually impaired.
Fourteen hard-of-hearing and 11 visually impaired study participants were recruited at meetings of pentecostal Christian groups in three Mozambican villages and one town.
They were tested with a handheld audiometer or vision charts, depending on their impairment, both before and after they took part in a prayer session.
“There was a highly significant improvement in hearing across 18 ears of 11 subjects” and “significant visual improvements,” says the study, which will be published next month in the peer-reviewed Southern Medical Journal.
Two of the hard-of-hearing study participants were able to hear sounds at 50 decibels lower after the prayer session and three of the visually impaired subjects saw their vision improve from 20/400 or worse to 20/80 or better.
The study focused on the clinical effects of prayer and did not attempt to explain how or why some participants saw such remarkable improvements.
“This study shows that in some instances there are measurable effects that can be demonstrated using clinical studies,” Brown told AFP.
“I consider this very much a first step and an indication of the direction for where research needs to head. Much more needs to be found out about why these effects are noticed, what are the mechanisms, are there structural changes involved,” she said.
Stressing that their study sample was small and the conditions under which the study was conducted were far from ideal, the researchers urged “future study… to assess whether PIP may be a useful adjunct to standard medical care for certain patients,” especially in countries with limited care options.
“The implications are potentially vast given World Health Organization estimates that 278 million people, 80 percent of whom live in developing countries, have moderate to profound hearing loss in both ears and 314 million people are visually impaired,” the study says.
Copyright AFP
http://www.newsmaxhealth.com/health_stories/prayer_heals/2010/08/06/339394.html?s=al&promo_code=9898-1?s=al&promo_code=A722-1


Anon:
Simpler way, Pakistan cuts back on the corruption, stealing, and money to the Taliban and diverts it for a couple weeks to helping their own citizens.
Posted by Anon | August 12, 2010 5:21 AM